In Honor of Hufflepuff House [Part 2 of 5]: “Where They Are Just and Loyal”

[To read Part 1, click here.]

‘You might belong in Hufflepuff,

Where they are just and loyal,

Those patient Hufflepuffs are true

And unafraid of toil’

(The Sorting Hat’s Song, 1991)[1]

Justice and loyalty are virtues that are greatly valued by Hufflepuff House, and they are among the most important and recurring themes throughout the series. Justice is at the very heart of the story, as Harry and his friends observe and experience the various injustices of the world and attempt to fight against them. Loyalty is demonstrated by characters with various beliefs on different sides of the fight, and we see the power of loyalty to bring about both the worst and the best in people. Ultimately, those who have a loyalty to justice show how a combination of these virtues can improve the world.

Justice against Injustice

The fight against Lord Voldemort is a fight for justice, as he and his Death Eaters would create a world in which there is great injustice. They commit violence against innocent people, as Hagrid tells Harry about the first wizarding war: ‘Anyway, this – this wizard, about twenty years ago now, started lookin’ fer followers. Got ’em, too – some were afraid, some just wanted a bit o’ his power, ’cause he was gettin’ himself power, alright. Dark days, Harry. Didn’t know who ter trust, didn’t dare get friendly with strange wizards or witches … Terrible things happened. He was takin’ over. ’Course, some stood up to him – an’ he killed ’em. Horribly.’[2] Many of the Death Eaters believe in pure-blood supremacy and were motivated by that belief to join Voldemort and take discriminatory actions against those who are not of a pure-blood ancestry. This is demonstrated by various actions, from name-calling to discriminatory laws to violence, on the part of Death Eaters and their supporters.

During the second wizarding war, after Voldemort and his followers take over the Ministry of Magic, there are various discriminatory laws being put into place and discriminatory actions taken against anyone who is considered to be of inferior blood status. Attendance at Hogwarts is made mandatory for all young witches and wizards, so that the Death Eaters will have the chance to teach these students their ideology, and all students must show that they are of wizard descent in order to attend.[3] There is a Muggle-born Registration Commission (headed by Dolores Jane Umbridge) and the Ministry hauls those who they suspect of being Muggle-born in front of the Commission. They are accused of stealing magic from witches and wizards, as we see during the interrogation of Mary Elizabeth Cattermole.[4] Some who suspect they will be targeted go on the run to escape being captured, and people are threatened, imprisoned, and murdered for their blood status or their opposition to Voldemort.[5] Much of this is done with the claim that society is being made a better place.

One of the reasons why the Death Eaters, and all such villains, are so frightening is because they believe that what they are doing is correct. They are not comical villains, but rather villains whose ideology reminds readers rather disturbingly of the support for discrimination and persecution in our own world by people who claim they are doing the right thing. Though there are those who support Voldemort for various other reasons (such as fear, bewitchment, or a desire for power) many of the Death Eaters believe that their ideology of pure-blood supremacy is justice, that the world will actually be a better place for them and their families if those who are different from them are either killed or otherwise persecuted. They see themselves as protecting their families against a dangerous threat in their fight against those who are not pure-bloods.

This demonstrates that even those who are actually doing injustice may believe that they are doing what is right; we see how justice can be corrupted, and this corruption of justice — this mirror image of justice, which may insidiously integrate itself into society by resembling the real thing, by making claims of justice while promoting injustice — can convince a great many people to support it and even more to ignore its consequences.

As there are in the real world, however, there are people in this story who do not ignore those consequences. Those who are fighting against Voldemort and the ideology of blood purity are motivated by the injustice they see and a desire to make the world in which they live a better, more equal, place. As Sirius Black responds when Pettigrew ask what will be gained by fighting Voldemort, innocent lives can be saved by opposing evil.[6] As Remus says to Harry, when Harry expresses regret about the fact that Remus died so soon after his son Teddy was born, ‘I’m sorry too. Sorry I will never know him … but he will know why I died and I hope he will understand. I was trying to make a world in which he could live a happier life.’[7] We see in their willingness to fight for justice an understanding of what will happen to even more innocent people, in addition to those who have already been harmed, if Voldemort and his Death Eaters can rule unopposed. Professor Dumbledore helps Harry realize that it is his own knowledge of the harm caused by Voldemort that motivates him to fight, not the prophecy.

‘Imagine please, just for a moment, that you had never heard of the prophecy! How would you feel about Lord Voldemort now? Think!’

Harry watched Dumbledore striding up and down in front of him, and thought. He thought of his mother, his father and Sirius. He thought of Cedric Diggory. He thought of all the terrible deeds he knew Lord Voldemort had done. A flame seemed to leap inside his chest, searing his throat.

‘I’d want him finished,’ said Harry quietly. ‘And I’d want to do it.’[8]

Even though Harry is the boy who lived, even though there is a prophecy about him, it is not these things which motivate him to fight against Voldemort and the Death Eaters. Because of all he’s been through and learned before this conversation with Professor Dumbledore, he had already decided that he has to fight; he would fight Voldemort even if there was no prophecy. He does not feel that he is being forced to, but knows that he should, because of the injustice promoted by the Death Eaters.

We are motivated to cheer for the members of the Order of the Phoenix, Dumbledore’s Army, and their various allies because of their reasons for fighting against the Death Eaters. They are not merely taking up a fight against comical villains who are proud to be evil, against villains who we know are evil only by their being labeled as such. We see the harm that the Death Eaters are doing, and so we know that our heroes are fighting against injustice; therefore, their fight has behind it a certain moral and just cause that makes it essential for them to win. They must fight, not just because they have been told to do so, but because it is the right thing to do; they must win, not just because they are the main characters, but because their triumph will have an impact upon the lives of those around them. Their victory would mean much more, far more, than just a personal triumph, and their defeat would mean more, much more, than a personal failure. Upon their success or failure hinge the lives of many people, and it is because of the human desire for justice that we want them to win.

Justice is clearly an important theme throughout the books, both in its corruption and in its defense. This virtue, when corrupted, is a great force for evil in the world, and this same virtue, when defended, is a great force for good. The characters in the story each make decisions based upon their own ideas of justice. The characters’ motivations seem a reflection of our own world, because we so often take actions upon our own beliefs of what is just; we are familiar with the arguments between people who have different views and who all think that their beliefs and actions are the best possible way to achieve a better world. These actions affect the lives of others, sometimes intentionally and sometimes unintentionally, and should teach us to think before deciding on our own ideas of justice, given the power these ideas have to motivate the best and worst in human beings. The virtue of justice, so prized by Hufflepuff House, has a great impact upon this story and on the lives of its characters, showing us how people’s idea of what is just can define who they are, can motivate them to take great actions both good and evil, affect those around them, and change the world for both good and ill.

The Loyalties of Villains and Heroes

The loyalty of the fans of the Chudley Canons, who ‘live in hope of a renaissance’ despite the fact that many consider the team’s glory days to be over,[9] may be a source of good fun in the series — an attempt to show that we can become very devoted to our favorite sports team, band, or book series — but loyalty, and the actions taken by characters based upon their loyalties, are very important parts of the series. The importance of loyalty in the series is shown in Sirius Black’s memorable admonishment to Peter Pettigrew (the series’ infamous coward and traitor) after Peter tries to explain his betrayal by saying Voldemort would have killed him: ‘“THEN YOU SHOULD HAVE DIED,” roared Black. “DIED RATHER THAN BETRAY YOUR FRIENDS, AS WE WOULD HAVE DONE FOR YOU!”’[10] Sirius is willing to die rather than betray his friends, and he isn’t the only one. There are characters who stay true to their friends and to their cause, no matter what the danger, on both sides of the fight. We see throughout the story that a person’s loyalty, their devotion and dedication, can result in a myriad of outcomes and effects on others, based upon what exactly they are loyal to.

Bartemius ‘Barty’ Crouch Junior (son of the Minister of Magic of the same name) joined Voldemort and was sent (along with three other Death Eaters) to Azkaban for the torture of Frank and Alice Longbottom.[11] He was later able to leave the prison secretly when his mother disguised herself as him by drinking Polyjuice Potion and took his place. He lived under his father’s Imperius Curse before escaping and rejoining Voldemort, who gave him the assignment of impersonating Alastor Moody; since Moody was to be the Defence Against the Dark Arts professor during the 1994-5 school year at Hogwarts, this assignment would bring Crouch close to Harry and allow him to deliver Harry to Voldemort. After this plan is successfully carried out, and Voldemort has regained a body, Crouch (while still disguised as Alastor Moody) has a conversation with Harry in which he reveals his true loyalties (though Harry does not understand what is happening until Crouch later tells the whole story under the influence of Veritaserum).

‘If there’s one thing I hate more than any other, it’s a Death Eater who walked free. They turned their backs on my master, when he needed them most. I expected him to punish them. I expected him to torture them. Tell me he hurt them, Harry …’ Moody’s face was suddenly lit with an insane smile. ‘Tell me he told them that I, I alone remained faithful … prepared to risk everything to deliver to him the one thing he wanted above all … you.’[12]

Barty Crouch Junior valued loyalty and considered himself Voldemort’s most loyal Death Eater, because he served time in Azkaban while others went free and also because he helped Voldemort get back into power when others had abandoned him. Although he, unlike Bellatrix Lestrange, begs to not be sent to Azkaban, he believes that the fact of his imprisonment, later confinement by his father, and eventual taking on of the assignment to capture Harry demonstrated his loyalty to Voldemort. He is so fervent in his obsession about loyalty that he wishes to see those who were disloyal tortured. He is desperate to be praised for his loyalty by the person he considers his master, showing that loyalty to Voldemort has become his overriding obsession.

Bellatrix Lestrange is Voldemort’s most devoted follower, ‘his last, best lieutenant’[13] who stayed by his side and fought to her death, even after other Death Eaters had abandoned the fight. Even before her last stand, she was already known for both her loyalty to Voldemort and her cruelty. While there were Death Eaters and other supporters of Voldemort who claimed, when the first wizarding war ended, that they had been bewitched and forced to follow Voldemort, she didn’t. When she is on trial along with three other Death Eaters for the torture of Frank and Alice Longbottom, she says, ‘The Dark Lord will rise again, Crouch! Throw us into Azkaban, we will wait! He will rise again and will come for us, he will reward us beyond any of his other supporters! We alone were faithful! We alone tried to find him!’[14] After Draco Malfoy joins the Death Eaters, his mother Narcissa Malfoy (Bellatrix’s sister) is concerned about him, worried that he will not be able to complete the task Voldemort has given him and be killed as a punishment. When Narcissa expresses this concern, Bellatrix says to her, ‘If I had sons, I would be glad to give them up to the service of the Dark Lord!’[15] Her loyalty to Voldemort is so strong that she is willing to sacrifice anything for him. She is loyal even when others are not, and her loyalty to Voldemort becomes her greatest goal, an essential part of her character.

Voldemort has his followers, some more loyal than others. After he regains his body, he summons his Death Eaters to the graveyard in Little Hangleton, where Tom Riddle Senior (Voldemort’s Muggle father) is buried and accuses most of them of forsaking him. He says, ‘I ask myself … why did this band of wizards never come to the aid of their master, to whom they swore eternal loyalty?’ When a Death Eater named Avery begs forgiveness, Voldemort refuses, saying that he wants thirteen years’ repayment for the thirteen years he was without a body after his defeat at Godric’s Hollow. There are three people who Voldemort believes have been most loyal to him. He praises the Lestranges, saying ‘They went to Azkaban rather than renounce me … when Azkaban is broken open, the Lestranges will be honored beyond their dreams’. He refers to Barty Crouch Junior as the one ‘who remains my most faithful servant, and who has already re-entered my service’.[16] Voldemort demands loyalty of an extreme degree, commanding his followers to forsake everything for him, to go to prison for him, to die for him, to kill for him. His demand for service is a vivid illustration of loyalty taken to its extremes for the most horrible of causes.

Loyalty is demonstrated by characters on the other side of the fight as well, of course. Hermione and Ron are loyal to Harry, from their remaining friends with him even when other students were gossiping and spreading rumors about him to their willingness to risk their lives to help him defeat Voldemort. When Harry tells Ron and Hermione that he’s not planning to return to Hogwarts for his seventh year, and will instead be searching for Voldemort’s Horcruxes to destroy them and eventually kill Voldemort himself, they say they will come with him.

‘We’ll be there, Harry,’ said Ron

‘What?’

‘At your aunt and uncle’s house,’ said Ron. ‘And then we’ll go with you, wherever you’re going.’

‘No –’ said Harry quickly; he had not counted on this; he had meant them to understand that he was undertaking this most dangerous journey alone.

‘You said to us once before,’ said Hermione quietly, ‘that there was time to turn back if we wanted to. We’ve had time, haven’t we?’

‘We’re with you whatever happens,’ said Ron.[17]

Ron’s statement, ‘We’re with you whatever happens’ is an excellent summation of the essence of loyalty. Loyalty is demonstrated, not by staying by a person during the good times, but by staying by them no matter what happens. There are various characters who demonstrate great loyalty to certain people and causes.

Nymphadora Tonks, herself a Hufflepuff,[18] shows great loyalty in both her personal life and in her work for the Order. She demonstrates her love for and her loyalty to Remus Lupin when she says that she wants to be in a romantic relationship with him regardless of the fact that he’s a werewolf.[19] Even though she knows that she will be shunned by many in wizarding society because of her decision to become romantically involved with a werewolf, she does not allow that to stop here from expressing her feeling for Remus.

Perhaps the character whose loyalties most intrigued readers throughout the series and whose actions and motivations continue to be a topic of great discussions is Severus Snape. Snape’s loyalties confused and mislead those around him. He acted as a double agent during the second war, with both sides believing he was on their side until he killed Dumbledore,[20] which provided confirmation for the members of the Order that he was actually loyal to Voldemort.[21] We get hints of Snape’s personality, past, and motivations throughout the story,[22] but it is not until after his death, when Harry looks at Snape’s memories in the Pensieve,[23] that Snape’s love of Lily and some of his reasons for switching sides, secretly helping Dumbledore and the Order (including killing Dumbledore due to Dumbledore’s own request), are revealed. Snape’s loyalties have a great influence on Harry’s life and his task of defeating Voldemort. His character has been analyzed, with many varying interpretations offered; his reasons and motivations for his actions (for joining the Death Eaters in the first place and leaving them to help the Order in the second place) are extremely important and the various hints we receive are taken into account during the analysis. How a reader interprets his actions, words, and memories to determine his motivations and loyalties greatly influences that reader’s opinion of him; that his actions, thoughts, and loyalties were of utmost importance to the story is evident.

Loyalty, another virtue prized by Hufflepuff House, plays an essential role in the story. The various characters in the books show loyalties to their families, friends, and causes. They make difficult decisions when they are faced with conflicting loyalties, and the decisions they make have a big effect on those around them. These characters, and more besides, reflect the world in which we live, as we make our own decisions based upon our own loyalties. In our own lives, we demonstrate the depth of our loyalties to our loved ones and to the ideas which we believe in. One of the reasons that the loyalties of the characters resonate so much with us is because of this similarity between our own world and theirs, between our own personalities and theirs. The virtue of loyalty, so valued by Hufflepuff House, can be used for both good and ill; it has the power to motivate the best and the worst in humanity, depending on what the person is loyal to, and the loyalties of the characters in this story are an essential part of them, just as our loyalties are of us.

A Loyalty to Justice

Throughout the series, characters take actions based upon what they believe is right and demonstrate their loyalty to those who they love and to the causes they support. Based upon their ideas of justice and their loyalty, they take greatly varied actions. It is those, however, who demonstrate their great loyalty to justice by risking their own lives to make the world better and more equal who show us the best of what these virtues can inspire.

Part of this loyalty to justice is the realization that the lives of others are worth defending, that one’s own comfort in a society should not be one’s sole concern, but that we should also be concerned about how our society treats those who are different from us in some way. On an episode of the underground radio program Potterwatch, a conversation between Kingsley Shacklebolt (‘Royal’) and Lee Jordan (‘River’) contains this important sentiment.

‘Muggles remain ignorant of the source of their suffering as they continue to sustain heavy casualties,’ said Kingsley. ‘However, we continue to hear truly inspirational stories of wizards and witches risking their own safety to protect Muggle friends and neighbours, often without the Muggles’ knowledge. I’d like to appeal to all our listeners to emulate their example, perhaps by casting a protective charm over any Muggle dwelling in your street. Many lives could be saved if such simple measures are taken.’

‘And what would you say, Royal, to those listeners who reply that in these dangerous times, it should be “wizards first”?’ asked Lee.

‘I’d say that it’s one short step from “wizards first” to “pure-bloods first”, and then to “Death Eaters”,’ replied Kingsley. ‘We’re all human, aren’t we? Every human life is worth the same, and worth saving.’[24]

Harry, Ron, and Hermione are in a tent, during their extended journey to find and destroy Voldemort’s Horcruxes, when they hear this broadcast of Potterwatch. They have been having a very difficult time during their journey, as they must look for Horcruxes using the limited information that they have and avoid being caught or killed in the process, even though they are being specifically targeted and searched for. Ron’s return has cheered up the group significantly, and Potterwatch cheers them up even more, as they hear the voices of friends who they have not seen for quite a while and about whom they have been concerned. The reason these three friends are putting themselves in danger is for the reason that is stated by Kingsley on Potterwatch; they believe that every human life is worth saving, regardless of the person’s blood status or other differences. They demonstrate through their actions, and their taking on of this great responsibility, that they are truly dedicated to their cause, and they show that their cause is just by advocating a position which puts them in mortal danger.

During the Battle of Hogwarts, many of the students want to stay to fight the Death Eaters, even many who are not yet of age. When Pansy Parkinson wants to hand Harry over to Voldemort, students stand up to defend him, despite Voldemort’s threat.

Before Harry could speak, there was a massive movement. The Gryffindors in front of him had risen and stood facing, not Harry, but the Slytherins. Then the Hufflepuffs stood, and, almost at the same moment, the Ravenclaws, all of them with their backs to Harry, all of them looking towards Pansy instead, and Harry, awestruck and overwhelmed, saw wands emerging everywhere, pulled from beneath cloaks and from under sleeves.[25]

After this display of loyalty to Harry, students who are of age have to decide if they will stay to fight in the battle or leave. Included among those who stay behind are many of the members of Hufflepuff House. The reason for this is because they, being in a house that values justice and loyalty, are motivated by their belief that fighting Voldemort is the right thing to do. Though it is not only the Hufflepuffs who contribute to the fight against Voldemort (in fact, members of all four houses do), these essential values of justice and loyalty are a part of Hufflepuff House’s beliefs, showing that Hufflepuff is important, not just an extra house.

This action by the students near the end of the story is symbolic of an ongoing idea; this theme of characters having a great loyalty to justice is present from the very beginning of the story. In the saga’s first chapter, we learn of the deaths of Lily and James Potter, killed by Voldemort.[26] They fought against the Death Eaters and sacrificed their lives. As Hagrid tells Harry, who had not heard the truth about his parents’ previously,

‘Now, yer mum an’ dad were as good a witch an’ wizard as I ever knew. Head Boy an’ Girl at Hogwarts in their day! Suppose the myst’ry is why You-Know-Who never tried to get ’em on his side before … probably knew they were too close to Dumbledore ter want anythin’ ter do with the Dark Side.

‘Maybe he thought he could persuade ’em … maybe he just wanted ’em outta the way. All anyone knows is, he turned up in the village where you was all living, on Hallowe’en ten years ago. You was just a year old. He came to yer house an’ – an’ –’[27]

They weren’t the only ones who were maimed or killed at the hands or on the orders of the Dark Lord, though. Hagrid also tells Harry that Voldemort ‘killed some o’ the best witches an’ wizards of the age – the McKinnons, the Bones, the Prewetts’.[28] Four years later, Alastor Moody shows Harry a picture of the original Order of the Phoenix, including many people who were killed. Among the names are some familiar ones, including Marlene McKinnon, Edgar Bones, and Fabian and Gideon Prewett, in addition to several others.[29] Frank and Alice Longbottom, also members of the Order, reside at St Mungo’s Hospital for Magical Maladies and Injuries, because they were tortured into insanity by Bellatrix Lestrange.[30] These are people who put themselves at great risk and were terribly hurt or killed due to their participation in the Order; they joined the organization and went into the fight knowing the risks, and chose to take those risks, because they believed that it was just, and they were truly demonstrating their loyalty to justice by taking those risks.

Part of the loyalty to justice that is shown by various characters is seen when people who could have, if they wanted to, stayed out of the fighting and yet chose to put themselves in danger because they know that fighting against Voldemort and the Death Eaters is the right thing to do. Sirius Black, a pure-blood, could have joined Voldemort. He told Harry that his parents, though not Death Eaters themselves, approved of Voldemort’s beliefs and actions.[31] Unlike Muggle-borns, Sirius would not have been automatically targeted due to his blood status; he could have adopted beliefs of pure-blood supremacy and become a Death Eater. Nymphadora Tonks, being a Metamorphmagus,[32] could have chosen to go into hiding, taking on a disguise so that she would not be recognized. Considering that she was especially being targeted by Bellatrix Lesrange,[33] one of Voldemort’s most dedicated and deranged followers, such a decision on her part may have even been understandable. Remus Lupin is discriminated against in wizarding society because he is a werewolf;[34] he could have made a decision similar to that of Fenrir Greyback some other werewolves who sided with Voldemort. Even though Voldemort and the Death Eaters may have provided him with an outlet for his frustration and anger against wizarding society, he chose to join the Order. These are people who had danger all around them, and the opportunity available to choose a safer option; however, they chose to do the more dangerous, more moral thing, by being just and by showing that they were loyal to the cause by fighting, and ultimately dying, for it.

There is, then, the boy who lived. Harry walks into the Forbidden Forest, walks willingly to his death, in order to make sure that Voldemort can be defeated.[35] Though Harry’s sacrifice is the one that offers protection to those who are fighting against Voldemort in the final battle[36] and though it contains significant symbolism from readers’ perspective, his sacrifice is one of many throughout the story. He demonstrates his great dedication to defeating Voldemort by walking willingly to his death; others who fought did not know for certain that they would die, but they knew there was a good chance they would end up either dead or seriously injured.

All the characters who sacrifice their lives to defeat Voldemort echo the sentiments expressed by Regulus Arcturus Black, who wrote in a note to Voldemort (after realizing his mistake in joining the Death Eaters), ‘I face death in the hope that when you meet your match, you will be mortal once more.’[37] There is, in this statement, a mixture of acknowledging one’s own mortality and impending death while hoping that another person in the future will continue, and finish, the fight. After Harry’s sacrifice, Dumbledore tells Harry that he has the choice of whether or not to go back to fight Voldemort, adding, ‘By returning, you may ensure that fewer souls are maimed, fewer families are torn apart. If that seems to you a worthy goal, then we say goodbye for the present.’[38] This sentiment is also echoed by the characters who fought against Voldemort; they decided to join the fight for the lives of innocent people and continued to fight even when they had already given so much.

A person can demonstrate loyalty to an unjust cause, which is why loyalty alone is not sufficient; a person can believe in justice but not feel enough loyalty to the idea to take action based upon it, which is why the belief alone is not sufficient. Many people have beliefs about what they think is just and many people have ideas to which they are loyal, but this story teaches us that the truly good thing to do is to support true justice that helps others and to be loyal to this cause to such a degree that risks to oneself are considered acceptable. The characters who are extremely loyal, but to an unjust cause (which they believe to be just), become the most terrifying villains. The characters showing great loyalty to justice become to us, the readers, heroes, because they consider the lives of others important and are willing to put themselves at risk to create a better world. Both justice and loyalty are included in the story through the words and actions of characters who clearly place much importance in them and are motivated by them; these values, considered important to Hufflepuff House, are essential to the story to such a degree that the books would not convey the same ides if these values were not included.

[To read Part 3, click here.]


References

[1] Rowling, J. K. Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone. London: Bloomsbury, 1997, Ch 7, p. 88. Print.

[2] Philosopher’s Stone, Ch 4, p. 45.

[3] Rowling, J. K. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. London: Bloomsbury, 2007, Ch 11, p. 173. Print.

[4] Deathly Hallows, Ch 11, pp. 172-3; Ch 13, pp. 206-15.

[5] Deathly Hallows, Ch 15, pp. 242-7; Ch 21, pp. 338-43; Ch 22, pp. 355-61.

[6] Rowling, J. K. Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban. London: Bloomsbury, 1999, Ch 19, pp. 274-5. Print.

[7] Deathly Hallows, Ch 34, p. 561.

[8] Rowling, J. K. Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince. London: Bloomsbury, 2005, Ch 23, p. 478. Print.

[9] Rowling, J. K. Kennilworthy Whisp’s Quidditch Through the Ages. London: Bloomsbury, 2001, Ch 7, p. 66. Print.

[10] Prisoner of Azbakan, Ch 19, p. 275.

[11] Rowling, J. K. Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. London: Bloomsbury, 200, Ch 30, pp. 516-525. Print.

[12] Goblet of Fire, Ch 35, pp. 582-600 (quote from pp. 586-7).

[13] Deathly Hallows, Ch 36, p. 590.

[14] Goblet of Fire, Ch 30, pp. 516-25 (quote from p. 517); cf. Rowling, J. K. Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix. London: Bloomsbury, 2003, Ch 25, pp. 480-1. Print.

[15] Half-Blood Prince, Ch 2, pp. 37-9 (quote from p. 39).

[16] Goblet of Fire, Ch 33, p. 561-71 (quote from pp. 562, 564-5).

[17] Half-Blood Prince, Ch 30, p. 607.

[18] J. K. Rowling had originally stated that Tonks was in Hufflepuff House on her official website http://www.jkrowling.com. Since then, however, the site has been redesigned and the pages that once contained the extra information about characters are no longer there. Information about Tonks can be found at http://harrypotter.wikia.com/wiki/Nymphadora_Tonks.

[19] Half-Blood Prince, Ch 29, p. 582.

[20] Half-Blood Prince, Ch 27, p. 556.

[21] Half-Blood Prince, Ch 28, p. 573-9 and Chapter 30, p. 593-5.

[22] See, e.g., Philosopher’s Stone Ch 17, p. 217; Prisoner of Azkaban, Ch 18, pp. 261-2; Rowling, J. K. Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix. London: Bloomsbury, 2003, Ch 26, p. 521 and Ch 28, pp. 563-73. Print.; Half-Blood Prince Ch 25, pp. 508-14 and Ch 30, pp. 593-4. (There are many passages one could cite; I’ve included the ones that came to mind.)

[23] Deathly Hallows, Ch 33, pp. 529-53.

[24] Deathly Hallows, Ch 22, p. 357.

[25] Deathly Hallows, Ch 31, pp. 490-1.

[26] Philosopher’s Stone, Ch 1, pp. 14-5.

[27] Philosopher’s Stone, Ch 4, p. 45.

[28] Philosopher’s Stone, Ch 4, p. 45.

[29] Order of the Phoenix, Ch 9, pp. 157-9.

[30] Order of the Phoenix, Ch 23, pp. 454-5.

[31] Order of the Phoenix, Ch 6, pp. 103-4.

[32] Order of the Phoenix, Ch 3, pp. 51-2.

[33] Deathly Hallows, Ch 1, pp. 16-7 and Ch 5, p. 68.

[34] See, e.g, Prisoner of Azkaban, Ch 22, p. 309; Order of the Phoenix, Ch 14, p. 271; Deathly Hallows, Ch 11, p. 175-6. (There are many passages one could cite; I’ve included the ones that came to mind.)

[35] Deathly Hallows, Ch 34, pp. 554-64.

[36] Deathly Hallows, Ch 36, p. 591.

[37] Half-Blood Prince, Ch 28, p. 569. cf. Deathly Hallows, Ch 10, p. 154.

[38] Deathly Hallows, Ch 35, p. 578.

In Honor of Hufflepuff House [Part 1 of 5]: Introduction; or, The Misconception Summarized

Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry has four houses (named after the four founders of the school) into which new students are sorted: Gryffindor, Hufflepuff, Ravenclaw, and Slytherin. Gryffindor is focused on, because it is the house of Harry, Ron, and Hermione. Slytherin is also often discussed, as is the house of their school rival turned uncertain Death Eater Draco Malfoy, of the villain Lord Voldemort, and of the intriguing Severus Snape. Ravenclaw comes to the forefront when Luna Lovegood is one of the students who travel to the Ministry of Magic near the end of the 1995-6 school year and when Rowena Ravenclaw’s diadem is found to be one of Voldemort’s Horcruxes. Hufflepuff receives some attention when Cedric Diggory becomes one of the four champions in the Triwizard Tournament and is murdered and when Harry, Ron, and Hermione must come up with a plot to break into Gringotts to find Hufflepuff’s Cup in the Lestranges’ vault; despite this, however, less information is found out about Hufflepuff throughout the series, compared to the other three houses, and some characters have a negative opinion in of the House. When Harry meets Draco for the first time in Madam Malkin’s, Draco says about being sorted into houses, ‘Well, no one really knows until they get there, do they, but I know I’ll be in Slytherin, all our family have been – imagine being in Hufflepuff, I think I’d leave, wouldn’t you?’ After their conversation, Harry asks Rubeus Hagrid some questions about what Draco said (since Harry is not yet familiar with the wizarding world). About the school houses, Hagrid gives voice to a common perception of Hufflepuff when he says, ‘Everyone says Hufflepuff are a lot o’ duffers, but –’[1] Whether or not Hagird personally has a negative opinion of Hufflepuff is uncertain, as he is cut off before finishing his sentence, but Harry learns from him that Draco’s opinion of Hufflepuff House is not uncommon in the wizarding world.

Within the Harry Potter fandom, there is a certain amount of willingness among some fans to take seriously the insults that are targeted at Hufflepuff. The lesser amount of information we find out about the house may contribute to this feeling. Even among fans who may not necessarily dislike or hate Hufflepuff House (feelings that are sometimes expressed towards Slytherin) there are those who think of it as being boring or not good enough. It is sometimes seen as the extra house, where students are sent if they aren’t exceptional enough in the qualities that the other houses value.

My contention is that this is a misconception. Rather, the opposite is true: The characteristics valued by Hufflepuff House and its founder are exceptional and ever-present throughout the journeys of Harry Potter and his friends, as well as being essential in the fight against Voldemort. The negative opinions of some characters (which are included in the series, in my view, to create a realistic world with school rivalries and misconceptions about others) are shown to be false upon analyzing the books. The story contains a clear message that justice and loyalty, hard work, and equality are of the utmost importance.

[To read Part 2, click here.]


References

[1] Rowling, J. K. Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone. London: Bloomsbury, 1997, Ch 5, pp. 59-62 (quotes from pp. 60 and 61). Print.

Book Review: J. K. Rowling’s “The Casual Vacancy”

But then, so local legend told, came the sudden darkness that attends the appearance of the wicked fairy. (J. K. Rowling, The Casual Vacancy)[1]

Barry Fairbrother dies (of an aneurysm) within the first few pages of J. K. Rowling’s new book The Casual Vacancy. His death will likely not surprise readers, as it is mentioned in the synopsis, but it does surprise the people in the town of Pagford. The book is about the aftermath of his death, and during that aftermath, we see into the minds of various Pagford citizens whose lives interact with one another’s and show some of the most disturbing aspects of life.

This book was released on 27 September 2012, and I finished reading it in early October. I decided that I should write a review, but the idea of doing so presents a certain personally fascinating topic for thought. It should perhaps be clear from my confessed devotion to[2] and frequent writing about[3] the Harry Potter series that my reviewing of any book by J. K. Rowling will present the dilemmas of how to make sure I am being as fair as possible and how to determine what effects my love of Harry Potter is having on my review. This feeling began even before the book was released. I was extremely excited about the release of Vacancy, but also felt a feeling of quiet dread; I felt afraid that I would hate it or that I would be so biased due to my love of Harry Potter that I would not be able to judge the book fairly, considering it better than it actually is (due to my bias in favor of the author) or considering it worse than it actually is (by comparing it to Harry Potter and thereby, inevitably, finding it lacking). I have mentioned before that I think Barry’s death is a metaphorical death for Harry Potter,[4] and I think Vacancy is a book that, because it is the first book by a famous author that is not part of her beloved series, presents fans with the excitement and nervousness of unexplored territory.

The territory, it turns out, is fascinating but uneven in places, sometimes delightfully and sometimes frustratingly. This is a book that takes a while to become enthralling. The book is divided into eight parts, seven of which are numbered One through Seven with a part called (Olden Days) in between Part One and Part Two. Each part begins with a (surprisingly relevant) quote from Charles Arnold-Baker’s Local Council Administration, Seventh Edition. Part One reads a bit like a prologue that’s meant to give small amounts of information that will be expanded upon later, but at fifty pages long, it’s a bit lengthy for that role and it takes at while for the reader to get settled into the world of this book. The reader is introduced to many characters in quick succession; the purpose of this is to introduce them by showing their reactions to the death of Barry Fairbrother. The beginning sections of the part called (Olden Days), from page 51 to page 62, read more like the actual beginning of the story, after the Part One prologue has ended. This section introduces the reader to the history of the Pagford and its relationship with nearby Yarvil and with the Fields (the council estate just north of Pagford). After this, the remainder of the part titled (Olden Days) and the rest of the book continue with the stories of the various characters, their interactions with each other, and their personal struggles within the larger narrative. The structure of the story is clearly very important, because experiencing the story from the points of view of certain characters during certain events helps to build the different levels of the narrative and gives us insight into various characters’ minds.

The characters in Vacancy range from the fascinating to the boring, from the sympathetically almost-lovable to the thoroughly despicable. It sometimes happens in a story with many points of view that I will find myself looking forward to certain sections moreso than others, and that was the case with this book as well; there were certain characters who were immediately interesting and whose sections I would look forward to reading, and other characters whose sections I found a struggle to get through. Certain characters were better written and more developed than others. It has been commented on by others that Rowling’s teenage character are more sympathetic and interesting than her adult characters — an assessment which I think is partially accurate for this book specifically. The teenagers in this book are all extremely fascinating. Krystal Weedon is, of course, the person whose life story shows the central theme of the story, and she is portrayed in a way which makes the reader cheer for her to overcome the struggles she is faced with and despair when horrors occur in her life. Sukhvinder Jawanda almost immediately became one of my favorite characters soon after she was introduced. Andrew “Arf” Price is extremely sympathetic due to his horrible home life and his struggle to be brave enough to stand up to his abusive father. Gaia Bawden is at first just the loud teenage daughter of one character and the crush of another, but she becomes more interesting as the story goes on, especially in her friendship with Sukhvinder. Some characters, despite being not very likeable, were still interesting to read about. One such character was Stuart “Fats” Wall. Though he is one of the characters I very much disliked, due to his treatment of Suchvinder and sympathetic feelings towards Simon Price, his sections are among the best writing in the book. Not all of the adult characters are beyond redemption, however, and some were among the best characters in the story. Parminder Jawanda, Kay Bawden, Tessa Wall were great to read about; in addition to each of their roles in the story, they were each full-developed as characters in their own rights, in addition to being sympathetic due to at least some of their actions. Parminder’s internal struggle about her motivations for wanting to help the people in the Fields and her reminders to herself, when she has acted in a way she feels ashamed of, that she ought to see the good in everyone make her story fascinating. Her actions which emotionally harm her daughter Sukhvinder make me angry at her, but the fact that she does this unknowingly makes me feel sad for her as well. Kay Bawden is a social worker whose concern for the Weedons makes her an almost-immediately likeable character and I ended up wishing that she would be able to inspire more characters to share her dedication. Tessa Wall is the guidance counselor who wants to help her students, but at the same time, has trouble with her own son at home, especially in dealing with the relationship between her son Stuart Wall and husband Colin Wall. By contrast, some other characters were not as well-developed. Samantha and Shirley Mollison were defined almost entirely by their rivalries and resentments. Colin Wall was a character who I would have liked to know more about, but it’s understandable why his story wasn’t central to the narrative. There were some characters, such as Howard Mollison and Gavin Hughs, who were effective in showing legitimate problem in society (with Howard Mollison’s reasons for being against the Fields sounding extremely similar to arguments put forward by politicians in our own world), but who were not as fascinating and didn’t motivate a desire to know more about them. Overall, Rowling has a talent for creating fascinating characters who take on a life of their own in readers’ imaginations, but that talent was on display here for only some of the characters and not others.

The writing in this book may seem shockingly different from the writing in Rowling’s previous books, due to the profanity and descriptions of sex, but after this briefly surprising impression, there is the recognition of the fact that these aspects are appropriate for this particular story. Reading Rowling without Harry, Ron, and Hermione is initially an odd experience, but once I got settled in, I began to recognize the familiar contours of Rowling’s writing. As uncomfortable a place as Pagford is, and despite the fact that readers likely want to run away from it as quickly as we wanted to run towards Hogwarts, Rowling’s writing is — at least in some places — a welcome place to return to. Though I did not finish reading this novel as quickly as I got through each of the Harry Potter books, it is still compulsively readable after a bit of a slow start.

Vacancy contains important social messages, the most prominent of which is the theme about how we treat others and how a person’s actions can affect others, sometimes even in ways the person is not aware of. This is not a story of a gigantic battle between good and evil, but it is about how little good and bad things done by individual people affect others, and the story of this village is powerful despite the small size of its setting, due to the fact that its story is relevant to so many societies and to humanity in general. There are certain parts of the book which are disturbing reminders of the horrors which occur in the world, bringing to mind the reader’s own personal experiences. While reading the book, there were several times when I felt that sick feeling of recognition, that feeling that an author has so well captured a situation I have been in or a feeling I have experienced that I feel both ill at the reminder and grateful for the understanding. This book illustrates the existence of bullies without the comfort of a story in which the bullied find allies and triumph over those who hurt them. It shows a world in which teenagers cause great harm to their peers without others in the class standing up for the student who is being bullied, in which those who are abused and assaulted find themselves without anyone to turn to for help, and in which adult bullies are in positions of power with the ability to make life much worse for those who are already in desperate circumstances. This is where Rowling’s writing is at its best, as she is able to write passages which make us feel the horror of being in the situations her characters are experiencing. There is great emphasis on both the mundane aspects and horrors of life, with some hints that hope exists but is easily defeated by humanity’s great faults — one of which is our ability to avoid paying attention to and thinking about things which make us uncomfortable. The last line of the book reads, “Her family half carried Terri Weedon back down the royal-blue carpet, and the congregation averted its eyes.”[5] This, I think, a wonderful summation of the social message of the book. Many of the people in the town of Pagford have been ignoring the plight of those who are in less fortunate circumstances than themselves, sometimes even despising people like the Weedons instead of feeling motivated to help them. At the end of the story, though they regret what happened to Robbie Weedon, there is not a great indication that they have realized their mistakes or changed their behavior. To put it another way, this is a book in which the funeral of Barry Fairbrother is one of the most humorous passages.

This book is one of that number which come with automatic audiences; there are a great many Harry Potter fans (myself included) who decided to read this book due to our love of Rowling’s previous books. This is, I suppose, to be expected whenever any book by J. K. Rowling is released. Readers who judge this book against their feelings towards Harry Potter will likely be disappointed. (It would perhaps be too much to ask for a repeat of the series’ success; there are books which take on such a central role in a person’s life that not many others, even those by the same author, will be considered equal.) Readers who are willing to accept that their opinion of J. K. Rowling’s most recent book do not have to be equivalent to their feelings of her previous ones may find a book worth reading. This isn’t a book which will be reread innumerable times by fans looking to return to a beloved story and a place where they feel hope. It is, however, worth reading and considering, given the writing and the subject matter it addresses.


References

[1] Rowling, J. K. The Casual Vacancy. London: Little, Brown, 2012, (Olden Days), III, p. 55. Print.

[2] Sharmin, Ani J. Harry Potter is Love. Retrieved on 24 October 2012 from http://eternalbookshelf.wordpress.com/harry-potter-is-love/.

[3] The link goes to the posts in the “Harry Potter (i.e. My Life)” category on my blog. These posts can be found at http://eternalbookshelf.wordpress.com/category/harry-potter-i-e-my-life/.

[4] Sharmin, Ani J. J. K. Rowling’s New Testament “The Casual Vacancy”: My Thoughts on the Announcement and Hopes for the Book. Posted on 13 April 2012 at The Eternal Bookshelf. Retrieved on 10 November 2012 from http://eternalbookshelf.wordpress.com/2012/04/13/rowlings-the-casual-vacancy-announcement/.

[5] Vacancy, Part Seven, p. 503.

“Do Some Good in the World”: a blog entry in honor of J. K. Rowling and Harry Potter’s Birthday

July 31st is the birthday of J. K. Rowling[1] and her famous fictional hero Harry Potter.[2] Continuing a tradition I started in 2010,[3] I decided to write an essay about an aspect of the Harry Potter series. This year, the topic of my essay is Hermione Granger’s dedication to using her talents and education to do good in the world and how she made brave decisions based on this dedication, showing who and what she truly is.

Hermione Granger is the best student in her year, who studied the set books by heart before starting her education at Hogwarts. She’s from a Muggle family and is very curious about the magic that is taught at Hogwarts,[4] asking an older student Percy Weasley about the classes on the first day of school.[5] She frequently raises her hand in class to answer questions and corrects her classmates when working together. It’s clear from the way that she is treated by some other students that she has quickly become known for being a good student (and perhaps for being a favorite of the professors), for following the rules, and for not having any friends. Rubeus Hagrid comments that “they haven’t invented a spell our Hermione can’t do.”[6] What is perhaps one of the most well-known descriptions of Hermione is spoken by Remus Lupin after she says she had already figured out that he is a werewolf. He says to her, “You’re the cleverest witch of your age I’ve ever met, Hermione.”[7] Hermione is clearly very concerned with doing well in school to such a degree that a boggart turns into Professor McGonagall telling her she had failed everything during her Defense Against the Dark Arts exam in third year.[8] Ultimately, however, it is not just Hermione’s intelligence that defines her and it is not her grades that she cares about above all else. As she says to Rufus Scrimgeour when he asks if she intends to go into a career in Magical Law, “No I’m not […] I’m hoping to do some good in the world!”[9] Although the comment is a way to show her negative opinion of the actions of the Ministry of Magic, the last part of it is actually an accurate statement of Hermione’s goal. Hermione’s dedication to doing the right thing, to helping others and being brave, is what motivates her to take certain actions and guides her decisions in how to use her education, abilities, and intelligence.

There are several instances when Hermione expresses views which show that there is a difference between a person’s talents and what they consider most important. On the train ride to Hogwarts at the beginning of her first year at the school, Hermione expresses her view that Gryffindor sounds like the best Hogwarts house, based upon the reading she has done about the magical world and the school.[10] Since Gryffindor House values bravery, this shows that Hermione greatly values bravery, even though her talents at schoolwork and love of books make one initially suspect that she could be sorted into Ravenclaw House. At the end of their first year at Hogwarts, when the three friends Harry, Ron, and Hermione, go through the trap door in the forbidden third-floor corridor to stop Lord Voldemort from obtaining the Philosopher’s Stone, all three of them use their abilities to contribute to the effort. Hermione is able to help them get past Devil’s Snare due to her remembering Herbology lessons and is able to solve a logic puzzle to figure the correct potions to drink to walk through magical fires that blocked their way. After Hermione praises Harry’s abilities as a wizard, Harry says he isn’t as good at magic as she is. She responds, “Me? […] Books! And cleverness! There are more important things – friendship and bravery and – oh Harry – be careful!”[11] This shows not that she considers books or cleverness unimportant, but that she values both friendship and bravery more than either of them. These statements by a young Hermione show what she believes more than her talents do. As in our own world, knowing a person’s talents may tell us what they are able to do, but knowing their beliefs and opinions tell us what they believe is right.

Hermione studies and does well in school, but her desire for knowledge and dedication to hard work is not limited to situations in which there will be a benefit to her grades. The situations when Hermione is the most fervent in her efforts are situation when she can use her intelligence and cleverness to do some good in the world. When Hermione sees how badly house-elves are treated by their masters without their masters being confronted or condemned[12] and learns that there are house elves at Hogwarts,[13] she becomes motivated to help them. She criticizes Hogwarts: A History (a book which she often references and usually thinks highly of) due to its omission of the school’s house-elves. She says, “Not once, in over a thousand pages, does Hogwarts: A History mention that we are all colluding in the oppression of a hundred slaves!”[14] She does research about the treatment of house-elves and starts the Society for the Promotion of Elfish Welfare (S.P.E.W).[15] During the fight against Lord Voldemort, Hermione’s intelligence and abilities are indispensible. She makes preparations for the journey that she, Harry, and Ron are going to embark upon by studying about Horcruxes and making sure they will have the supplies that they will need.[16] This shows that Hermione believes that her education is not an end in and of itself but should be used to do good things; she believes in using her abilities and efforts to improve the world. She does not limit her hard work and studying to topics which will earn her good marks in school or a good job in the future, but makes an effort to learn about the horrible things that are going on in her world and then tries to make things better. There are many talents a person can have, but the goals towards which they use those talents tells us what they value, and Hermione clearly values making the world a better place. We have to make choices about what to spend our time on and decide what we aim to accomplish with the abilities we have been given, and those choices show who and what we truly are.

A person may believe that certain actions are right but still be concerned about the consequences they will face, and their ability to overcome their fears will determine whether or not they are able to do what is right. Hermione’s actions and words show that, even though she is concerned about breaking the rules and taking possibly dangerous actions, she is even more concerned about doing the right thing. In their first year, after Harry, Ron, Hermione, and Neville are nearly caught roaming around Hogwarts in the middle of the night and come across a three-headed dog in the process, Hermione says to Harry and Ron, “I hope you’re pleased with yourselves. We could all have been killed – or worse, expelled. Now, if you don’t mind, I’m going to bed.”[17] However, while Hermione does not want to get in trouble, she is willing to break the rules if there is something important to be done. While she does not believe that a duel with a rival classmate is worth sneaking out in the middle of the night and possibly getting into trouble, there are other situations in which she believes breaking the rules is justified. In their second year at Hogwarts, when there are mysterious threats and attacks against Muggle-borns, Harry, Ron, and Hermione decide to investigate to determine who opened the Chamber of Secrets. Hermione suggests brewing the Polyjuice Potion and the three friends are able to convince Professor Lockhart to sign a permission slip allowing them to get the book Moste Potente Potions out of the restricted section of the school library. After seeing the recipe for the potion, Ron and Harry express doubt about the endeavor but Hermione convinces them that they should go through with it.

Ron turned, speechless, to Harry, who had another worry.

“D’you realise how much we’re going to have to steal, Hermione? Shredded skin of Boomslang, that’s definitely not in the students’ cupboard. What’re we going to do, break into Snape’s private stores? I don’t know if that’s a good idea …”

Hermione shut the book with a snap.

“Well, if you two are going to chicken out, fine,” she said. There were bright pink patches on her cheeks and her eyes were brighter than usual. “I don’t want to break rules, you know. I think threatening Muggle-borns is far worse than brewing up a difficult potion. But if you don’t want to find out if it’s Malfoy, I’ll go straight to Madam Pince now and hand the book back in …”

“I never thought I’d see the day when you’d be persuading us to break rules,” said Ron. “All right, we’ll do it. But no toenails, OK?”

“How long will it take to make, anyway?” said Harry, as Hermione, looking happier, opened the book again.[18]

This conversation shows that Hermione is willing to break the rules in some instances, especially when the cost of not doing so would lead to harm. Three years later, during their fifth year at Hogwarts, Harry, Ron, and Hermione start Dumbledore’s Army because Dolores Umbridge (the Defense Against the Dark Arts teacher during that school year) is not teaching her students properly. Hermione proposes the idea to Harry and Ron and convinces Harry to secretly teach a group of students. She says to them, “It’s about preparing ourselves, like Harry said in Umbridge’s first lesson, for what’s waiting out there. It’s about making sure we really can defend ourselves.” The first meeting is outside the school, in the village of Hogsmeade because, as Hermione says, “I don’t think Umbridge would be very happy if she found out what we were up to.”[19] Hermione participates in creating this organization, even though she knows that they will get in trouble if they are caught, because she knows (as do the others who join) that their Defense education is important, especially since Lord Voldemort has returned. At the end of their sixth year, when Harry says he is not going to return to Hogwarts for seventh year so he can find and kill Voldemort, Ron and Hermione say they will go with him, even though Harry is reluctant to let them come. Hermione says, “You said to us once before […] that there was time to turn back if we wanted to. We’ve had time, haven’t we?’[20] They all know that the journey will be dangerous and that they will be risking their lives, but they are all willing to undertake it anyway, because they realize that defeating Voldemort is very important, as he has been murdering innocent people. Even though Hermione cares about the rules and about being safe, she is just as willing to participate in the effort. She knows she has the option to go into hiding, and she knows that she will especially be targeted as a Muggle-born and as a friend of Harry Potter, but she is willing to take that risk. As Hermione faces different situations in life, she modifies her views from what they once were and realizes that there are some instances when breaking the rules or taking dangerous actions is justified and morally right. She is willing to get in trouble if it means helping her friends and especially if it helping others who are being hurt. The situations in which a person is willing to break rules and put themselves in danger show what that person values, and Hermione’s actions show that she considers loyalty to her friends, bravery, and standing up against injustice very important. In our own lives, we are also faced with situations in which we feel that the danger of a certain action is worth it. We may find ourselves, like Hermione, concluding that it’s morally right to take an action that puts us in danger and hoping we have similar courage to do the right thing.

Hermione Granger, though she is known for her bookishness and cleverness, shows through her words and actions what she values. She believes it is important to be brave and loyal to one’s friends; she is motivated by a desire to help others and fight for justice; and she believes that doing the right thing is so important that she is willing to put herself in danger in order to do what she believes is right. Albus Dumbledore’s said, “It is our choices […] that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities”[21] and the choices that Hermione makes throughout her life show what she truly is – a person who wants to do some good in the world.

Happy Birthday to J. K. Rowling and Harry Potter!


References

[1] J. K. Rowling. Harry Potter Wiki entry. Retrieved on 17 July 2012 from http://harrypotter.wikia.com/wiki/J._K._Rowling.

[2] Harry Potter. Hary Potter Wiki entry. Retrieved on 17 July 2012 from http://harrypotter.wikia.com/wiki/Harry_Potter.

[3] To see the essays in my 31 July series go to http://eternalbookshelf.wordpress.com/category/31-july-series/.

[4] Rowling, J. K. Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone. London: Bloomsbury, 1997, Ch 6, p. 79. Print.

[5] Philosopher’s Stone, Ch 7, pp. 93-4.

[6] Rowling, J. K. Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets. London: Bloomsbury, 1998, Ch 7, p. 89. Print.

[7] Rowling, J. K. Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban. London: Bloomsbury, Ch 17, p. 253. Print.

[8] Prisoner of Azkaban, Ch 16, p. 234.

[9] Rowling, J. K. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. London: Bloomsbury, 2007, Ch 7, p. 105. Print.

[10] Philosopher’s Stone, Ch 6, pp. 79-80.

[11] Philosopher’s Stone, Ch 16, pp. 196-208. [Direct quote from p. 208.]

[12] Rowling, J. K. Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. London: Bloomsbury, 2000, Ch 9, pp. 118-125. Print.

[13] Goblet of Fire, Ch 12, pp. 161-2.

[14] Goblet of Fire, Ch 15, pp. 210.

[15] Goblet of Fire, Ch 14, pp. 197-9.

[16] Deathly Hallows, Ch 6, pp. 81-91; Ch 9, pp. 135-6.

[17] Philosopher’s Stone, Ch 9, p. 120.

[18] Chamber of Secrets, Ch 9, pp. 120-1; Ch 10, pp. 122-5. [Direct quote from p. 125.]

[19] Rowling, J. K. Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix. London: Bloomsbury, 2003, Ch 15, pp. 289-94; Ch 16, pp. 295-310. [Direct quotes are from p. 291 and p. 297.] Print.

[20] Rowling, J. K.Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince. London: Bloomsbury, 2005, Ch 30, p. 607. Print.

[21] Chamber of Secrets, Ch 18, p. 245.

This Book Needs No Introduction: On The Fifth Anniversary of the Release of J. K. Rowling’s “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows”

For now, all I could do was stare at the words I had just written on my screen, words that would shape the next several months of my life, that signified the end of an extraordinary time, a time that had given me confidence and purpose and independence, an era in which millions of people found fun and community and enchantment under one boy wizard’s thrall.

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows will be published on July 21, 2007.”

(Melissa Anelli, Harry, A History)[1]

Today is the fifth anniversary of the release of J. K. Rowling’s Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. The book was released on Saturday 21 July 2007, the day that fans had been counting down to ever since the release date was announced on 1 February 2007.[2] Rowling had finished writing the book earlier that year, leaving on a bust of Hermes in her room at the Balmoral Hotel in Edinburgh a note that read, “JK Rowling finished writing Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows in this room (652) on 11th Jan 2007”.[3] The announcement of the release date was an historic moment for us; on that day, we knew when the story would end. We knew this would be, as Anelli wrote in Harry, A History (quoted above), the end of a very important time in our lives; it was the end of a story that had shaped our lives in such a way that we knew that we’re different people for having read it, and we knew that its influence on our lives wouldn’t end, even when the story did.[4]

I went to a bookstore early on that summer morning, and bought the book with the money I had saved for this purpose. I came back to the car and sat in the back seat. I remember opening the book and looking at the summary (as I do whenever I start reading a book) on the front flap of the dust jacket, seeing the following words:

WE NOW PRESENT THE SEVENTH

AND FINAL INSTALLMENT

IN THE EPIC TALE OF

HARRY POTTER[5]

I remember being happy and amused that there was no summary — that this book, metaphorically and literally, needed no introduction. There were already people lining up to get their copies of Deathly Hallows, eager to read it.

The journey through the book was magical. As I started reading, I knew this was the last book, and as much as I wanted to know what would happen next, I also didn’t want the story to end. I have so many memories.

I remember being touched by the dedication: “The dedication of this book is split seven ways: To Neil, to Jessica, to David, to Kenzie, to Di, to Anne, and to you, if you have stuck with Harry until the very end.”[6] I remember being surprised by the epigraphs, one from Aeschylus’s The Libation Bearers[7] and one from William Penn’s More Fruits of Solitude,[8] being moved by them and also afraid for my favorite characters, afraid that they would be killed off during the book.

I remember feeling excited and happy that the story started with Severus Snape, because I very much wanted to know more about him and his true loyalties. I remember reading Elphias Doge’s article about Albus Dumbledore, in the chapter so appropriately titled “In Memoriam”. I remember feeling annoyed at the Dursleys one last time, surprised by Dudley’s show of appreciation. I remember feeling the sense of reunion when thirteen people showed up to escort Harry to safety, feeling grateful for their bravery. I remember seeing the title of chapter five (“Fallen Warrior”) and feeling anxious about who would die, then feeling that the deaths (though sad) were appropriate, showing that even someone who had been constantly vigilant could be cut down by evil.

I remember the little time left of feeling safe at the Burrow, filled with family frustrations that seemed so minor compared to the task that was ahead for our heroes. I remember the Weasleys’ birthday gift to Harry, and Harry hugging Mrs. Weasley. I remember being inspired by Hermione, who was ready to face whatever was ahead and determined to keep working hard until their goal was accomplished. I remember feeling scared when Bill and Fleur’s wedding was interrupted, the three little sentences, the ten terrifying words — “The Ministry has fallen. Scrimgeour is dead. They are coming.”[9]

I remember returning to 12 Grimmauld Place, the house having lost the merriment of friendship and instead having become a hideout surrounded by enemies on all sides. I remember loving Lily’s sweet letter, moved that Sirius had kept it all these years, and being correct about R. A. B.’s identity. I remember being happily surprised by Kreacher’s change of heart and upset by Remus’s anger.

I remember the Ministry turned to tyranny, the Commission, the cruelty of Dolores Umbridge, and Mary Elizabeth Cattermole thinking of her children. I remember Voldemort’s overheard thoughts, taking a toll on Harry’s mind, and overheard conversations of those on the run, giving hope in the hardest of times. I remember being unbelievingly furious at Ron for abandoning his friends. I remember being moved nearly to tears when Harry and Hermione visited the graves of Lily and James Potter, with Harry wishing he could be dead and buried under the snow with them. I remember being terrified when Harry and Hermione were attacked by Nagini and Voldemort in Bathilda Bagshot’s home. I remember being moved and fascinated by the life of Albus Dumbledore, struggling to decipher the truth from the lies along with Harry. I remember Ron’s triumphant return.

I remember loving the ceiling of Luna’s bedroom, a reminder of friendship amidst the feeling of loneliness. I remember The Tale of the Three Brothers, a fairy tale having such a great impact upon lives. I remember Potterwatch. I remember Draco Malfoy’s fear and his lie. I remember fearing for Hermione as she was tortured by Bellatrix, wanting to cry out her name in terror with Ron. I remember the decision between Hallows and Horcruxes. I remember the greatest bank robbery of all time.

I remember returning to Hogsmeade, finding it under the Death Eaters’ control. I remember Aberforth Dumbledore’s story and having hope despite his advice. I remember Neville Longbottom leading Dumbledore’s Army and wanting to cheer at his bravery. I remember walking into Hogwarts again, into a home that’s been infiltrated by evil. I remember the Battle of Hogwarts, wanting to cry at the death and destruction, as my home went up in flames and my friends laid down their lives.

I remember the Prince’s Tale, finally knowing the truth about Severus Snape, the character who had and has been the subject of much conversation and many questions.

I remember the boy who lived walking to his death.

I remember Albus Dumbledore’s post-mortem advice, his wisdom living on after his death, with the last line of the chapter “King’s Cross” so aptly summarizing not only Harry’s experience but our experience with the story — “Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?”[10]

I remember Molly Weasley surprising line and the death of the Dark Lord’s most faithful follower, his “last, best lieutenant”.[11] I remember the defeat of Lord Voldemort, the cheers at his death, and the boy who lived wanting a sandwich.

I remember returning to Platform 9¾ on the way back home to Hogwarts.

I remember “All was well.”[12]

Lastly, I remember most of all, the feeling that I wanted the story to go on, for my favorite characters to be alive, for story to never end.

I finished reading book seven in the middle of the night, about an hour into Monday morning. While writing this entry, I decided to go find the journal entry I wrote after reading the book. (I keep an ink-and-paper journal.) The entry dated Monday, July 23, 2007 is about how much I loved the book and how I loved that Rowling introduced a whole new story (about the Deathly Hallows) and wove it into the existing story in addition to bringing the previous plotlines to their conclusion. I wrote about how sad I was that so many characters died but that I understood their deaths were not in vain. I also wrote about how I am going to read lots of other books, because there are so many universes to explore. I wrote then, and I know now, that the lessons I have learned from Harry will stay with me.

These books have been a way for me to find others who love to read as much as I do and who don’t think it’s weird that I enjoy talking about fiction. I have friends who I initially met or got to know because we talked about books. As a confessor stated in a submission to the Harry Potter Confessions blog, “Without Harry Potter, I would still be sitting in the library by myself.”[13] I remember that before Harry I used to feel that I was different due to my love of books, but Harry Potter was the first book series for which I participated in fandom and spoke with others who were just as obsessed with the books as I was. Finding out that there are communities of people in the world who love to read and realizing I could participate in these communities made me feel great joy.

The story has also helped me think about our own world. I read the books and look at the world in which I live, and there are so many parts of the world which I find reflected in those pages. As I reread the books, I find ideas within them that I hadn’t noticed before, I find that some part of the story is relevant to something that is going on in my life or something I am thinking about. The story has taught me and continues to teach me important lessons that are relevant to the real world; everything — friendship and family, sadness and fear, morality and meaning — is affected by the fact that I’ve read these books and continue to think about their story.

I can’t believe it’s been five years. Here’s to many more.


References

[1] Anelli, Melissa. Harry, A History: The True Story of a Boy Wizard, His Fans, and Life Inside the Harry Potter Phenomenon. New York: Pocket Books, 2011, Ch 1, p. 8. Print.

[2] Anelli, Melissa. DEATHLY HALLOWS RELEASE DATE ANNOUNCED. Posted on 1 February 2007 at The Leaky Cauldron. Retrieved on 10 July 2012 from http://www.the-leaky-cauldron.org/2007/2/1/deathly-hallows-release-date-announced.

[3] Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. Harry Potter Wiki entry. Retrieved on 10 July 2012 from http://harrypotter.wikia.com/wiki/Harry_Potter_and_the_Deathly_Hallows.

[4] Sharmin, Ani. The Great Transition: Thoughts on the Future of the Harry Potter Fandom. Posted on 3 July 2012 at The Eternal Bookshelf. Retrieved on 10 July 2012 from http://eternalbookshelf.wordpress.com/2012/07/03/the-great-transition/.

[5] Front flap of the US edition of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows.

[6] Rowling, J. K. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. New York: Scholastic Inc., 2007, dedication, p. v. Print.

[7] The text in the epigraph (from the US hardback edition of Deathly Hallows, p. xi) reads as follows:

Oh, the torment bred in the race,

the grinding scream of death

and the stroke that hits the vein,

the hemorrhage none can staunch, the grief,

the curse no man can bear

But there is a cure in the house,

and not outside it, no,

not from others but from them,

their bloody strife. We sing to you,

dark gods beneath the earth.

Now hear, you blissful powers underground —-

Answer the call, send help.

Bless the children, give them triumph now.

Aeschylus, The Libation Bearers

[8] The text in the epigraph (from the US hardback edition of Deathly Hallows, p. xi) reads as follows:

Death is but crossing the world, as friends do the seas; they live in one another still. For they must needs be present, that love and live in that which is omnipresent. In this divine glass, they see face to face; and their converse is free, as well as pure. This is the comfort of friends, that though they may be said to die, yet their friendship and society, in the best sense, ever present, because immortal.

William Penn, More Fruits of Solitude

[9] Deathly Hallows, Ch 8, p. 159

[10] Deathly Hallows, Ch 35, p. 723

[11] Deathly Hallows, Ch 36, p. 590

[12] Deathly Hallows, Epilogue, p. 759

Cover Art and Name Change; or, I remember Barry Fairweather

Cover of J. K. Rowling’s “The Casual Vacancy”

Today (3 July 2012) Little, Brown released the cover of J. K. Rowling’s The Casual Vacancy, along with a page count, a correction to the name of one of the characters, and a synopsis (Hawk at Mugglenet,[1] Catherine at The Leaky Cauldron,[2] Sims at Hypable[3]). The official page count is 512 pages. The name of the only character we know about so far is actually Barry Fairbrother. (The original press release referred to him as Barry Fairweather.) The synopsis is almost identical to the one released previously, but I’ll post it here again anyway. It reads as follows:

When Barry Fairbrother dies in his early forties, the town of Pagford is left in shock.

Pagford is, seemingly, an English idyll, with a cobbled market square and an ancient abbey, but what lies behind the pretty façade is a town at war.

Rich at war with poor, teenagers at war with their parents, wives at war with their husbands, teachers at war with their pupils…Pagford is not what it first seems.

And the empty seat left by Barry on the parish council soon becomes the catalyst for the biggest war the town has yet seen. Who will triumph in an election fraught with passion, duplicity and unexpected revelations?

A big novel about a small town, The Casual Vacancy is J. K. Rowling’s first novel for adults. It is the work of a storyteller like no other. (Little, Brown[4] and Hachette[5])

The image on the cover confused me at first, but then I realized that it looks like a ballot, with a mark in a box for the candidate the person is voting for. After spending many years looking at the covers of the Harry Potter book and associating them with J. K. Rowing’s writing, it feels odd to have a cover that looks so different from those ones, but that attachment to previous books should not be the basis a prejudgment on this one. I do wonder, however, if some publishers think that having a single image on a book cover makes it seem more appropriate for adults. I remember that Bloomsbury released the Harry Potter books with two different covers, one for adults and one for children, and the adult covers seem to all feature one item.[6]

The announcement correcting Barry Fairbrother’s name made me think of the fascinating and weird details about the printing histories of various works (e.g. differences between editions, famous printing errors). One of the most famous examples is a reprint of the Bible which was published in 1631 which advised readers to commit adultery due to an error which removed the word not from Exodus 20:14.[7] Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s The Adventure of the Cardboard Box (one of the stories in the canon of Sherlock Holmes) is printed in The Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes in most UK editions and in His Last Bow in most US editions due to controversy surrounding the story when it was first published, which necessitated a republication.[8] I wonder if, many years from now, the erroneous press release will be an item of trivia. I can imagine a footnote in the future, in some special annotated edition, stating, “In the  original press release announcing The Casual Vacancy, Barry Fairbrother was erroneously referred to as Barry Fairweather. It is still possible to find articles, fan site pages, and blog entries from April 2012 to June 2012 referring to a character named ‘Barry Fairweather’ in The Casual Vacancy.” In addition to this, another fact which I find amusing is that we fans had already begun analyzing Barry’s name (in addition to noticing that Barry rhymes with Harry), and now we’ve learned that his name is different from what we thought it was.

There are always funny little surprises — such is fandom, such is life.

#

Acknowledgement

I found the image via Hypable (see reference #3), and they note that they found it on Amazon.


References

[1] Hawk, Keith. Cover art for J. K. Rowling’s new book ‘The Casual Vacancy’ is released. Posted on 3 July 2012 at MuggleNet. Retrieved on 3 July 2012 from http://www.mugglenet.com/app/news/show/5811.

[2] Catherine. Cover Art of “The Casual Vacancy” Revealed. Posted on 3 July 2012 at The Leaky Cauldron. Retrieved on 3 July 2012 from http://www.the-leaky-cauldron.org/2012/7/3/cover-art-of-the-casual-vacancy.

[3] Sims, Andrew. J. K. Rowling’s ‘The Casual Vacancy’ book cover art released! Posted on 3 July 2012 at Hypable. Retrieved on 3 July 2012 from http://www.hypable.com/2012/07/03/j-k-rowlings-the-casual-vacancy-book-cover-released/.

[4] The cover release for THE CASUAL VACANCY by J. K. Rowling. Posted on 3 July 2012 at Little, Brown Book Group. Retrieved on 3 July 2012 from http://www.littlebrown.co.uk/TheCasualVacancyCover.

[5] The Casual Vacancy: Little, Brown and Company release the cover for The Casual Vacancy by J.K. Rowling, along with updated cover copy, details of the audio reader, and confirmed page count. Posted on 3 July 2012 at Hachette Book Group. Retrieved on 3 July 2012 from http://www.hachettebookgroup.com/features/littlebrown/feature-vacancy.html.

[6] Cover art. Harry Potter Wiki entry. Retrieved on 3 July 2012 from http://harrypotter.wikia.com/wiki/Cover_art.

[7] Wicked Bible. Wikipedia Entry. Retrieved on 3 July 2012 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wicked_Bible.

[8] “The story’s place”. The Adventure of the Cardboard Box. Wikipedia entry. Retrieved on 3 July 2012 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Adventure_of_the_Cardboard_Box#The_story.27s_place.

The Great Transition: Thoughts on the Future of the Harry Potter Fandom

A few months ago, the Harry Potter fandom received some great news within the span of a few days. On 12 April 2012, J. K. Rowling’s official website reopened with information about her upcoming book The Casual Vacancy.[1] Two days later, on 14 April 2012, Pottermore (the official Harry Potter website that includes an online experience with new content by J. K. Rowling)[2] ended its Beta phase and opened its gates to the public.[3] I think the month of April 2012 will go down in the Harry Potter fandom’s history as a great month.

In addition to being a very exciting time, this three-day span, to me, symbolizes the transition into the next era of the fandom. As I’ve mentioned before, the release of J. K. Rowling’s non-Harry Potter writing will the moment when the Harry Potter fandom and the J. K. Rowling fandom will no longer be synonymous.[4] We will have multiple stories to read and discuss. We will be able to analyze a whole other literary universe of Rowling’s creation when The Casual Vacancy is released in September and even more universes if she writes more stories. Still, Harry Potter has become a part of the lives of so many people that no matter how eagerly we anticipate other works from Rowling and no matter how much we may (or may not, as the case may be) enjoy them, Harry will always be there — Hogwarts, as we Harry Potter fans love to say, is home. It is the place where we lived for so long in our minds, the place where so many people grew up or otherwise experienced important years of their lives.

There is, I believe, a certain attachment I develop to certain books that is built as much upon what I bring to the story as the contents of the story itself; there are factors in addition to the merit of the works themselves which contribute to their lasting effect on me, and I suspect the same is true of other readers. There are certain books that, because I read them at a certain point in my life or because there was some part of the story that struck some inner chord, become a part of my life and influence me to such a degree that I think I would be a different person now if I had not read those books — and the Harry Potter series definitely qualifies for that description. A common statement made by fans about the series is, “Harry Potter is my childhood”. (In an interview in 2010,[5] Rowling said, “There was a girl who came up to me on the street the other day, she bloomed out of the pavement … and she must have been in her early twenties, and she said to me, ‘You are my childhood.’ About the nicest thing anyone has ever said to me.”)[6] This moving statement is an acknowledgement of the fact that many fans were growing up while the Harry Potter books were being released, many starting to read the series as children or pre-teens, when only one or a couple of the books were published, and reading Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows as older teenagers or adults. (I started reading the series when I was eleven, and I was nineteen when Deathly Hallows was released.) It is not, however, just a nostalgic feeling for childhood which keeps this story in our minds and hearts. Harry Potter isn’t just a story of childhood, but a story about life and, as J. K. Rowling said, “the true dilemmas of childhood are the dilemmas of the whole of life”.[7] This characteristic of the story teaches us that there is hope despite the difficulties of the real world, instead of just pretending that the difficulties don’t exist.[8] Its story holds ideas that have had a great effect on us, causing us to keep returning to its pages — for comfort, for inspiration, for advice, for the feeling that we have returned to a universe that will provide us with insight into our own. This is why, even though the future will bring new writing from Rowling and from many of our other beloved authors, the Harry Potter fandom will continue to thrive; this transition will move the series from the realm of heightened anticipation and predictions of character deaths into the realm of books which have already been released and which have established a place for themselves in the canon of literature. They will have a place next to the other works of literature on our bookshelves and will continue to be discussed and analyzed; time will tell if the series continues to be a topic of study many years in the future, as some of the greatest works of literature have been. Meanwhile, Rowling’s newer works might be (depending upon what readers think of them) the subjects of speculation and anticipation, of curiosity about the future of their plotlines.

Ultimately, I think that books and stories have a great power to influence our lives, even if they are fictional; these stories influence our futures, the decisions we make, the goals we have, and the meaning we find in our universe and existence. Melissa Anelli put it best in the update to her book Harry, A History when she wrote,

We who know can appreciate more fully what it means to be a book series. Books are (usually) paper and ink, yes, but the ink forms an image on our minds and informs our lives. What do we do when Harry Potter ends? The premise is faulty. Why would Harry Potter ever end? When in the history of human existence have well-considered words not left a mark? If reading is the gateway to compassion, if our power to imagine better is so linked to our ability to learn about that which we can’t experience ourselves, why do we discus endings at all?

Put another way: Of course it has all been in our heads, but why on earth should that mean it hasn’t been real?

Harry Potter will continue shaping the minds and imaginations of the people who come into contact with it, in whatever way that is. Harry Potter will be part of the legend and myth that becomes our shared social knowledge—part of the “mulch in the back of your head,” as Jo says. What we have been a part of here will be part of what we create forever; that which we love will never cease to exist.

And that’s the most wonderful thought for a fan.[9]

The line spoken by Albus Dumbledore in Deathly Hallows, which Anelli paraphrases, is one of my favorite lines of the whole series. In response to Harry’s question about whether the conversation the two of them just had was actually real (as Dumbledore died a year previously and Harry just sacrificed himself by allowing Lord Voldemort kill him), Dumbledore said, “Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?”[10] That sentence perfectly expresses the way that a story can have a big effect on a person, even if it is fictional. We may never have a new Harry Potter book to read, but the story we have had the great joy to read will stay with us forever. It is part of the foundation upon which we have and will build the rest of our lives.


References

[1] Sharmin, Ani. J. K. Rowling’s New Testament “The Casual Vacancy”: My Thoughts on the Announcement and Hopes for the Book. Posted on 13 April 2012 at The Eternal Bookshelf. Retrieved on 18 April 2012 from http://eternalbookshelf.wordpress.com/2012/04/13/rowlings-the-casual-vacancy-announcement/.

[2] Pottermore can be found at http://www.pottermore.com/.

[3] We’re opening to everyone. Posted on 14 April 2012 at Pottermore Insider. Retrieved on 18 April 2012 from http://insider.pottermore.com/2012/04/were-opening-to-everyone.html.

[4] Sharmin, Ani. And The Fandom Rejoiced: “J. K. Rowling’s New Testament”. Posted on 3 March 2012 at The Eternal Bookshelf. Retrieved on 7 May 2012 from http://eternalbookshelf.wordpress.com/2012/03/03/and-the-fandom-rejoiced/.

[5] Jo Rowling Interview on Oprah – Full Video. Interview on 1 October 2010. Uploaded at The Leaky Cauldron on 2 October 2010. Retrieved on 1 July 2012 from http://video.the-leaky-cauldron.org/video/1629.

[6] Drogos, Edward. Leaky Live Coverage: J. K. Rowling Interview on Oprah Winfrey Show. Posted on 1 October 2010 at The Leaky Cauldron. Retrieved on 1 July 2012 from http://www.the-leaky-cauldron.org/2010/10/1/leaky-live-coverage-j-k-rowling-interview-on-oprah-winfrey-show.

[7] Fisker, Trine.  Prinsesse overrakte pris til Potters mor.  Posted at Nyhederne (TV2) on October 19, 2010.  Retrieved on October 23, 2010 from http://nyhederne-dyn.tv2.dk/article.php/id-34363802:prinsesse-overrakte-pris-til-potters-mor.html.

[8] Sharmin, Ani. J. K. Rowling: “Children are not ‘they’. They are us.” Posted on 21 November 2010 at The Eternal Bookshelf. Retrieved on 2 July 2012 from http://eternalbookshelf.wordpress.com/2010/11/21/rowling-speech-hans-christian-andersen-literature-award/.

[9] Anelli, Melissa. “Four Years Later”. Harry, A History. Enhanced edition. New York: Pocket Books, 2011, “The Beginning”, p. 244. E-book.

[10] Rowling, J. K. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. London: Bloomsbury, 2007, Ch 35, p. 579. Print.

The Scottish Book Suspended: The Uncertain Fate of the Harry Potter Encyclopaedia

Back in April, when J. K. Rowling’s site was reopened, her answer to a frequently asked question concerning the Harry Potter Encyclopaedia caused great excitement in the fandom; many people, myself included, interpreted her words to mean that she was actively working on the Encyclopaedia and it would be published, albeit sometime in the far future.[1] On 22 May 2012, however, J. K. Rowling updated that page on her website with a different answer to that question.[2] Her new answer reads as follows:

Updated May 2012

I have been enjoying sharing information about Harry’s world on Pottermore for free, and don’t have any firm plans to publish it in book form.[3]

So, the fate of The Scottish Book is currently suspended, as it always had been before the reopening of Rowling’s website, in that place between existence and non-existence, with fans waiting eagerly to see if it will emerge from this unknown domain and into our world. It is, of course, Rowling’s story and her decision about what to write or not write. My love of books and my love of Harry Potter cause me to hope that, in the end, her decision will be to eventually write and publish it, even if it’s many years from now.

Though I have been enjoying Rowling’s new content on Pottermore immensely, the nature of the website is that a person has to click around to find the new content in bits and pieces. Although this can be fun, it does make finding the material again to reread and reference a bit of an issue. After going through the material for the first book on Pottermore, I went through the story again to copy and paste J. K. Rowling’s new content into a Word document (for my own use, so I can easily reread whenever I want to, without having to search through the pages on the site again). I think that the new material on the website has the potential to become unwieldy, scattered all over the place. (This potential for a disorganized release of new content has become even more likely given that there is an upcoming video game called Wonderbook: Book of Spells that will include new content from Rowling.)[4] To have all this new Harry Potter-related writing in one place, to have a book — a tome — that is the encyclopaedia of this magical world, would be wonderful. My guess is that the encyclopaedia is many years away (if it is released at all), and perhaps Rowling updated her site with the new message so that people aren’t anxiously awaiting it and asking her how far she’s gotten in writing it. It’s her decision, but it’s to be expected that fans will have hope for their favored outcome.

All of this is not to say that Harry Potter works are the only pieces of writing by J. K. Rowling that I am excited to read; I’m looking forward to The Casual Vacancy, to be released in September.[5] It’s just that the encyclopaedia would give a chance to learn more about this world I love, and it would actually be another book. I had begun to think of The (fabled and currently suspended) Scottish Book as the Harry Potter Apocrypha (inspired by J. K. Rowling’s new book The Casual Vacancy being referred to as J. K. Rowling’s New Testament), and it would seem that this was oddly somewhat appropriate, because the word apocrypha is from

late 14c., from L.L. apocryphus ‘secret, not approved for public reading,’ from Gk. Apokryphos ‘hidden, obscure,’ thus ‘(books) of unknown authorship’ (especially those included in the Septuagint and Vulgate but not originally written in Hebrew and not countd as genuine by the Jews), from apo- ‘away’

(see apo-) + kryptein ‘to hide.’ Properly plural (the single would be Apocryphon) but commonly treated as a collective sing.[6]

This book is not from an unknown author, but it certainly does seem to be hidden, its fate uncertain. With all the new Harry Potter-related merchandise being released in the near future, I do hope that — at least one more time, even if it is the last time — there is a new Harry Potter book to read, and that it is an archive of information about this beloved story.


References
[1] Sharmin, Ani. “The Scottish Book”: J. K. Rowling is working on the Harry Potter Encyclopaedia. Posted on 18 April 2012 at The Eternal Bookshelf. Retrieved on 27 May 2012 from http://eternalbookshelf.wordpress.com/2012/04/18/rowling-is-working-on-the-scottish-book/.
[2] Tannenbaum, Micah. Rowling ‘has no firm plans’ to publish Potter encyclopedia. Posted on 22 May 2012 at MuggleNet. Retrieved on 26 May 2012 from http://www.mugglenet.com/app/news/show/5669.
[3] Rowling, J. K. “What about the Harry Potter Encyclopaedia?” under FAQs. Retrieved 26 May 2012 from http://www.jkrowling.com/en_GB/#/about-jk-rowling/faqs-and-rumours.
[4] Sims, Andrew. Sony announces ‘Book of Spells’ for Playstation – a ‘Harry Potter’ game with ‘new writing’ from J. K. Rowling. Posted on 4 June 2012 at Hypable. Retrieved on 10 June 2012 from http://www.hypable.com/2012/06/04/harry-potter-book-of-spells-playstation/.
[5] Sharmin, Ani. J. K. Rowling’s New Testament “The Casual Vacancy”: My Thoughts on the Announcement and Hopes for the Book. Posted on 13 April 2012 at The Eternal Bookshelf. Retrieved on 7 May 2012 from http://eternalbookshelf.wordpress.com/2012/04/13/rowlings-the-casual-vacancy-announcement/.

[6] “apocrypha.” Online Etymology Dictionary. Douglas Harper, Historian. 10 Jun. 2012. <Dictionary.com http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/apocrypha&gt;.

“The Scottish Book”: J. K. Rowling is working on the Harry Potter Encyclopaedia

On J. K. Rowling’s official website,[1] which was recently redesigned and reopened, one of the frequently asked questions is “What about the Harry Potter Encyclopaedia?” Rowling responds,

For a long time I have been promising an encyclopaedia of Harry’s world, and I have started work on this now – some of it forms the new content in Pottermore. It is likely to be a time-consuming job, but when finished I shall donate all royalties to charity.[2]

The Harry Potter Encyclopaedia, referred to by Rowling as “The Scottish Book” (a reference to William Shakespeare’s Macbeth, which is called “The Scottish Play”) is the long-awaited guidebook to the Harry Potter universe.[3] In the past, Rowling has said that she knows a great deal of information about the story that was not included in the actual books, with hints about maybe writing the Encyclopaedia, but this is the first confirmation we have that she is actually writing the book and (it seems) plans to finish and publish it. This news initially received less attention than it perhaps otherwise would have, being in a sense buried by the announcement of The Casual Vacancy.[4]

Her answer to this question about the Encyclopaedia makes me very happy, and I’m very much looking forward to the book. (When her website reopened on 12 April and I was going through it, I came across the above passage, and felt so excited, though I could hardly believe it. I thought I might be reading too much into it, as very few people talking about it for the first day, but then various fan sites started reporting on the news.) This is very likely going to be one of those works that only an obsessed fan could love. Those who don’t enjoy the series won’t have much reason to read the Encyclopaedia and those who may have a slight interest in the series may not want to invest the time to read what will amount to a reference book, but for those of us who have found a home in the wizarding world, this book will give us the opportunity to learn more about the stories we love.

There are those who say that the release of an Encyclopaedia will give too much information, instead of letting fans use their imagination and interpret the stories. I understand the concern and feel this way as well sometimes, because I believe in the importance of readers interpreting the stories and finding meaning in them, and one of the fun parts is filling in the gaps that the author has left in the story, the unexplored territory and character histories that are fun to wonder about. Just one of many examples of this is the back-story of the Marauders (Messrs Moony, Wormtail, Padfoot, and Prongs), about which many in the fandom love to wonder. Their time at Hogwarts and during the First Wizarding War has been thought about and conjured up in the imaginations and fan fiction stories of a multitude of readers, each of us perhaps coming up with our own, slightly-different, version of events. On the one hand, we would love to know their back-story; on the other hand, many of us have devoted so much time to thinking up our own version of events that we may be disappointed if some of our imagined details turn out not to be canon. (One sub-topic of possible disappointment is the non-existence of a romantic relationship between Remus and Sirius for those who like to imagine that they were together before Sirius’s death.) Even though I understand the concern, I still want very much to read The Scottish Book.

Ultimately, I think that this will be something fun for the fandom, and that we will continue to use our imagination even if we receive more information about the series. After all, even though we know so much about the story from what we have already read, we continue to think about it, criticizing and reinterpreting and imagining what if the story had gone differently.

Really, my main questions concerning The Scottish book are (1) when it will be released and (2) exactly how thick its spine will be.


References

[1] J. K. Rowling’s official website can be found at http://www.jkrowling.com/.

[2] “What about the Harry Potter Encyclopaedia?” under FAQs. Retrieved on 13 April 2012 from http://www.jkrowling.com/en_GB/#/about-jk-rowling/faqs-and-rumours.

[3] Harry Potter Encyclopedia. Entry at the Harry Potter Wiki. Retrieved on 13 April 2012 from http://harrypotter.wikia.com/wiki/Harry_Potter_Encyclopedia.

[4] Sharmin, Ani. J. K. Rowling’s New Testament “The Casual Vacancy”: My Thoughts on the Announcement and Hopes for the Book. Posted on 13 April 2012 at The Eternal Bookshelf. Retrieved on 13 April 2012 from http://eternalbookshelf.wordpress.com/2012/04/13/rowlings-the-casual-vacancy-announcement/.

J. K. Rowling’s New Testament “The Casual Vacancy”: My Thoughts on the Announcement and Hopes for the Book

Yesterday, 12 April 2012, J. K. Rowling’s official website[1] reopened with a new design, and she announced a title and release date for The New Book that was previously mentioned.[2] It’s called The Casual Vacancy and will be released on 27 September 2012.[3] The synopsis reads,

When Barry Fairweather dies unexpectedly in his early forties, the little town of Pagford is left in shock.

Seemingly an English idyll, with a cobbled market square and an ancient abbey, what lies behind the pretty façade is a town at war.

Rich at war with poor, teenagers at war with their parents, wives at war with their husbands, teachers at war with their pupils…Pagford is not what it first seems.

And the empty seat left by Barry on the parish council soon becomes the catalyst for the biggest war the town has yet seen. Who will triumph in an election fraught with passion, duplicity and unexpected revelations?

Blackly comic, thought-provoking and constantly surprising, The Casual Vacancy is J.K. Rowling’s first novel for adults. (Rowling’s website,[4] Little, Brown[5])

This brings to mind “The Riddle House”, chapter one of Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, in which there are mysterious deaths in the village of Little Hangleton. The Muggle villagers do not know what actually happened (that Lord Voldemort murdered his Muggle father and paternal grandparents) and there are many rumors.[6] What would we see if we went from the scale of an entire world and focused in on this little town? Though I do not and cannot know the contents of Vacancy based upon the short and (probably intentionally) vague information provided, that it reminds me of a very fascinating chapter from one of her previous books makes me think and hope that the book contains a similar feeling of mystery and that she has perhaps explored themes she did not have a chance to fully delve into during her previous works.

When an author has written a fantastically famous and bestselling series and is moving on to a different book, there is always the question of how similar or different the new work will be from her previous works (as well as the anticipation that it is very unlikely to sell quite as well as the books she is most known for). Many other fans have commented on the amusing similarity of the names Harry and Barry, and also of note is the fact that one shocked those around him by surviving; and the other, by dying. Harry Potter is known as The Boy Who Lived,[7] because his survival surprised the wizarding world,[8] as he is the only person to ever survive the Killing Curse.[9] According to the synopsis of The Casual Vacancy, Barry Fairweather’s death surprises others (causing me to think of him as “The Man Who Died”). Another thought that I entertained was that maybe Barry’s death is Rowling metaphorically killing off Harry, symbolizing the end of the Harry Potter series and the publication of her first non-Harry Potter book.

Although this new novel is not a Harry Potter work, I hope that some of the elements of Rowling’s writing style that were evident from that series will be present in this work as well. This new novel is said to be “blackly comic” and I hope that is indeed the case. Rowling’s humor is one of the parts of her writing that I very much enjoy, based as it often is in everyday occurrences and in the weirdness of life. Vacancy is also said to be “thought-provoking” which many of us fans have come to expect from Rowling. Her writing is often relevant to reality, and I hope that this story also provides a lens through which to look at humanity and society and notice that which we may have missed. Additionally, and lastly for now, Rowling’s characters are among the most beloved parts of her previous writing, and I hope that this new novel contains characters readers can similarly find fascinating. This may seem a lot to ask, I know, but I’ve high expectations of my favorite authors.

There are one hundred and sixty-seven days left until the release of J. K. Rowling’s The Casual Vacancy. Let the countdown begin.

#

Acknowledgements

“J. K. Rowling’s New Testament” is the title of MuggleCast episode #250, after a comment made by Micah Tannenbaum.[10] Much thanks to the MuggleCasters for their awesome podcast.

Much thanks, also, to J. K. Rowling.


References

[1] J. K. Rowling’s official website can be found at http://www.jkrowling.com/.

[2] Sharmin, Ani. And The Fandom Rejoiced: “J. K. Rowling’s New Testament”. Posted on 3 March 2012 at The Eternal Bookshelf. Retrieved on 12 April 2012 from http://eternalbookshelf.wordpress.com/2012/03/03/and-the-fandom-rejoiced/.

[3] Hawk, Keith. Title, release date and website revealed for J. K. Rowling’s latest work. Posted on 12 April 2012 at MuggleNet. Retrieved on 13 April 2012 from http://www.mugglenet.com/app/news/show/5570.

[4] The Casual Vacancy, Timeline entry posted on 12 April 2012 at J. K Rowling’s official site. Retrieved on 12 April 2012 from http://www.jkrowling.com/en_GB/#/timeline/the-new-book.

[5] THE CASUAL VACANCY, by J. K. Rowling. Posted on 12 April 2012 at Little, Brown Book Group. Retrieved on 12 April 2012 from http://www.littlebrown.co.uk/TheCasualVacancy.

[6] Rowling, J. K. Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. London: Bloomsbury, 2007, Ch 1 (p. 7-19).

[7] Rowling, J. K. Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone. London: Bloomsbury, 1997, Ch1, p. 18.

[8] Philosopher’s Stone, Ch1, p. 15

[9] Goblet of Fire, Ch 14, p.191

[10] Sims, Andrew. MuggleCast Episode #250: J. K. Rowling’s New Testament. Posted on 2 March 2012 at Hypable. Retrieved 13 April 2012 from http://www.hypable.com/podcast/episode-250-j-k-rowlings-new-testament/.